• contemporary popular

    Nov 18 2008, 22h37

    people are quick in pigeonholing a broad spectrum of music from different genres and styles as "contemporary classical". if this would make sense, the music most people actually listen to is Contemporary Popular, again regardless of genre or style. in fact, "classical" or "popular" are not genres of music but broad terms for different forms of music creation and consumption. the defining criterion for Contemporary Popular is—popularity, music accessible to the general public via the mass media, and to a broad extent capable of being created by "everybody" without the need for a formal education in music and composition.

    Popular music is not to be confused with 'pop music' which is a range of mainstream styles with conventional structures, and anyone is potentially able to enjoy (or disgust) it immediately.

    Popular music is 80% of the music we all listen to, regardless of if we call it rock, metal, hardcore, alternative, pop, jazz, blues, folk, hip-hop, soul, funk, r&b, world, electronic, ambient, indie, underground, soundtrack or new age. the label doesn't make it. even some "classical" and so-called avant-garde and experimental music belongs to the realm of Contemporary Popular.

    let's be honest, serious, and unbiased. Contemporary Popular is the music of our time.
  • List of High Quality Music

    Out 2 2008, 18h21

    Preamble : SiR HendRix Rating System

    SiR HendRix Rating System employs a 50–100 point quality scale for individual musical tracks. the common 5-star rating points — [* to *****] — are not sufficient for rating the complexity of music and results in very subjective measures and inflated ratings. there is not so much 5-star [*****] music around as is rated in this world.

    this rating is very serious. it’s not about “best rock song ever. period” or “my personal top 10” or something similar.

    SiR HendRix takes a hard, very critical listen at tracks in order to underestimate and not overestimate the musical quality. if possible, in a peer group setting, i.e. comparing the track to be assessed with other representatives of the genre or style or with different covers resp. the original version.

    my own personal subjective 5-star rating goes into the whole rating with 10-20 percent only. 80 percent of the rating process is in-depth assessment of musical motif, arrangement and structure, variety and dynamics, development and depth/breadth of the theme, expression and feel, uniqueness and/or innovativity, and performance. last but not least, i rate overall quality and lasting impression. this is not done by one autition only. up to 5 malus or bonus points may be subtracted or added according to two lists of 10 criteria each (including sound quality, metrics, virtuosity, instrumentation, interplay, expression of heart, genius work, simplicity/pureness, overdo, etc.). don’t ask for the specific point ratings for a track, i won’t reveal them, only the end result.

    please note carefully : the ratings reflect a critical *listen at the music* and not just my personal opinion or taste. neither reputation nor being a fan nor the latest hip genre affect the rating in any manner. i don’t care. on the other hand, if a mainstream artist outside my listening habits performs well, he/she will get my points, no matter what. possible high ratings do not necessarily go with my love for the particular piece of music or the artist. i even could nearly object giving points and might be surprised or angried by my own rating results for artists i normally don’t care much about. my loved tracks would yield a different list, and i admit, i even do love mediocre music, we all do. but it simply won’t get my high ratings. i hope this clarifies the difference between love and assessment, it’s two different worlds.

    once again : SiR HendRix Excellence Rating is not about “music i like”. it’s about a deeper understanding, appreciation, acknowledgement (and objection) of music performances beyond personal tastes. otherwise we wouldn’t need the Rating System.

    the scoring of music is a professional task with applying a numerical system to it on a consistent basis. the advantage is rapid precise communication of quality to experts and amateurs alike, nothing more, nothing less.

    music rated over 85 points is very good to excellent. please mind that the majority of quality music usually doesn’t cost more to listen to than to mediocre music. we don’t need to settle for less.


    [*****]

    98-100 points
    unbelievable (AAA)

    the top of the crop. music in this range is jaw-dropping, heart-stopping, really more than we could reasonably expect ...

    95-97 points
    extraordinary, profound (AA)

    the very best, a rare level of greatness and elegance. music in this range has very high caliber, is overwhelming and might blow you away (or knock your socks off) ...

    90-94 points
    outstanding, high quality (A)

    this is where special effort begins. music in this range is exceptional and terrific, but only few will make it into this category ...


    [****]

    85-89 points
    flawless, very very good (BB)

    great value for the price. music in this range is very satisfactory and hardly objectionable ...

    80-84 points
    slightly above average (B)

    better than the bulk. music in this range has some redeeming features and is worth to be collected ...


    [***]

    75-79 points
    very average, straightforward, mediocre and unremarkable (CC)

    music in this range is generally pleasant but lacks complexity, character, or depth. this is where most of the mainstream music resides. just switch on the radio or TV. if you want to become somewhat famous and rich as an artist, go here.

    70-74 points
    slightly below average (C)

    music in this range is imbalanced and should be less expensive to pay for ...


    [**]

    60-69 points
    definitely below average (D)

    music in this range is flawed, amateurish and to be avoided at all costs ...


    [ * ]

    50-59 points
    poor, unacceptable, terribly dull (E)

    words are insufficient to describe the inadequacy of this music ...


    List of Quality [****] published in the House of Quality
    List of Excellence [*****] published in the _ Center of Excellence _


    i never ever will rate music upon request. so please don’t ask.
    if you told me this reminds you of Robert Parker’s wine rating system, i would respond: exactly.


    **** The List of Quality Music ****

    this list is ever evolving and so are the rating points.


    **** BB : very good ****

    89 points

    89 - Aretha Franklin - TocarPeople - a bit schmaltzy but her great voice wins over
    89 - De-Phazz - It Will Turn Out Right
    89 - Dinu Lipatti - Piano Sonata No.8 in A minor K310 II. Andante cantabile con espressione - by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
    89 - Enigma - TocarMea Culpa
    89 - Grover Washington - Just Enough
    89 - Jan Garbarek & The Hilliard Ensemble - Credo
    89 - Jazztronik - Someday (Etude for the Right)
    89 - Jean Boguet - Le Vent Dans La Plaine - by Claude Debussy
    89 - Joan Armatrading - TocarCool Blue Stole My Heart (Live) - Joan’s studio tracks mostly don’t compare to a vibrant and emotional live version with a particular band to be found on her album Performance Classics: Steppin' Out Live
    89 - Omar Sosa - TocarMis tres Notas - this cuban pianist is amazing, more to expect ...
    89 - 坂本龍一 Ryuichi Sakamoto - Lorenz And Watson
    89 - Trần Thu Hà - TocarWithout


    88 points

    88 - John Abercrombie - Carol's Carol
    88 - Mark Isham - TocarBarcelona


    87 points

    87 - Angélique Kidjo - TocarSummertime
    87 - Pink Floyd - Interstellar Overdrive
    87 - Rosalyn Tureck - Bach: The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1 - Fugue #13 In F Sharp, BWV 858


    86 points

    86 - Omara Portuondo - Killing me Softly - nice cover version by a charming cuban lady


    85 points

    85 - Mo' Horizons - TocarBosshannover


    **** B : slightly above average ****

    84 points

    84 - Rhythms Del Mundo feat. Chris Martin - Clocks - sweet & groovy cuban cover version which balances Chris Martin’s poor singing performance. truly alternative.


    83 points

    83 - La Capella Reial de Catalunya & Hesperion XXI - Mille Regretz (Chanson) - by Josquin Desprez (1450-1521)


    82 points

    82 - Rhythms del Mundo feat. Sting - Fragilidad - Sting’s own cuban cover version seems to be better than the original


    81 points

    81 - Caetano Veloso - Haiti
    81 - Cesária Évora - Miss Perfumado (4 Hero remix)
    81 - Cesária Évora - Petit pays (Chateau Flight remix)
    81 - Doruk Somunkiran - TocarStrange Company
    81 - El Lele De Los Van Van & Radiohead - High and Dry - Radiohead’s cuban cover version, happily doing without Thom Yorke’s falsetto


    the purpose of the House of Quality is to collect and document above-average music performances. don’t settle for less.

    for outstanding performances [90 and above = *****] refer to the List of Excellence, documented at the _ Center of Excellence _.


    SiR HendRix
    //
  • SiR HendRix Excellence Rating

    Set 30 2008, 21h42

    SiR HendRix Rating System

    SiR HendRix Rating System employs a 50–100 point quality scale for individual musical tracks. the common 5-star rating points — [* to *****] — are not sufficient for rating the complexity of music and results in very subjective measures and inflated ratings. there is not so much 5-star [*****] music around as is rated in this world.

    this rating is very serious. it’s not about “best rock song ever. period” or “my personal top 10” or something similar.

    SiR HendRix takes a hard, very critical listen at tracks in order to underestimate and not overestimate the musical quality. if possible, in a peer group setting, i.e. comparing the track to be assessed with other representatives of the genre or style or with different covers resp. the original version.

    my own personal subjective 5-star rating goes into the whole rating with 10-20 percent only. 80 percent of the rating process is in-depth assessment of musical motif, arrangement and structure, variety and dynamics, development and depth/breadth of the theme, expression and feel, uniqueness and/or innovativity, and performance. last but not least, i rate overall quality and lasting impression. this is not done by one autition only. up to 5 malus or bonus points may be subtracted or added according to two lists of 10 criteria each (including sound quality, metrics, virtuosity, instrumentation, interplay, expression of heart, genius work, simplicity/pureness, overdo, etc.). don’t ask for the specific point ratings for a track, i won’t reveal them, only the end result.

    please note carefully : the ratings reflect a critical *listen at the music* and not just my personal opinion or taste. neither reputation nor being a fan nor the latest hip genre affect the rating in any manner. i don’t care. on the other hand, if a mainstream artist outside my listening habits performs well, he/she will get my points, no matter what. possible high ratings do not necessarily go with my love for the particular piece of music or the artist. i even could nearly object giving points and might be surprised or angried by my own rating results for artists i normally don’t care much about. my loved tracks would yield a different list, and i admit, i even do love mediocre music, we all do. but it simply won’t get my high ratings. i hope this clarifies the difference between love and assessment, it’s two different worlds.

    once again : SiR HendRix Excellence Rating is not about “music i like”. it’s about a deeper understanding, appreciation, acknowledgement (and objection) of music performances beyond personal tastes. otherwise we wouldn’t need the Rating System.

    the scoring of music is a professional task with applying a numerical system to it on a consistent basis. the advantage is rapid precise communication of quality to experts and amateurs alike, nothing more, nothing less.

    music rated over 85 points is very good to excellent. please mind that the majority of quality music usually doesn’t cost more to listen to than to mediocre music. we don’t need to settle for less.


    *****

    98-100 points
    unbelievable (AAA)

    the top of the crop. music in this range is jaw-dropping, heart-stopping, really more than we could reasonably expect ...

    95-97 points
    extraordinary, profound (AA)

    the very best, a rare level of greatness and elegance. music in this range has very high caliber, is overwhelming and might blow you away (or knock your socks off) ...

    90-94 points
    outstanding, high quality (A)

    this is where special effort begins. music in this range is exceptional and terrific, but only few will make it into this category ...


    ****

    85-89 points
    flawless, very very good (BB)

    great value for the price. music in this range is very satisfactory and hardly objectionable ...

    80-84 points
    slightly above average (B)

    better than the bulk. music in this range has some redeeming features and is worth to be collected ...


    ***

    75-79 points
    very average, straightforward, mediocre and unremarkable (CC)

    music in this range is generally pleasant but lacks complexity, character, or depth. this is where most of the mainstream music resides. just switch on the radio or TV. if you want to become somewhat famous and rich as an artist, go here.

    70-74 points
    slightly below average (C)

    music in this range is imbalanced and should be less expensive to pay for ...


    **

    60-69 points
    definitely below average (D)

    music in this range is flawed, amateurish and to be avoided at all costs ...


    *

    50-59 points
    poor, unacceptable, terribly dull (E)

    words are insufficient to describe the inadequacy of this music ...


    List of Quality [****] published in the House of Quality
    List of Excellence [*****] published in the _ Center of Excellence _

    i never ever will rate music upon request. so please don’t ask.
    if you told me this sytem reminds you of Robert Parker’s wine rating system, i would respond : exactly.


    SiR HendRix
    //
  • The List of Excellence

    Set 30 2008, 21h34

    Preamble : SiR HendRix Rating System

    ( or skip and scroll down to the list below )

    SiR HendRix Rating System employs a 50–100 point quality scale for individual musical tracks. the common 5-star rating points — [* to *****] — are not sufficient for rating the complexity of music and results in very subjective measures and inflated ratings. there is not so much 5-star [*****] music around as is rated in this world.

    this rating is very serious. it’s not about “best rock song ever. period” or “my personal top 10” or something similar.

    SiR HendRix takes a hard, very critical listen at tracks in order to underestimate and not overestimate the musical quality. if possible, in a peer group setting, i.e. comparing the track to be assessed with other representatives of the genre or style or with different covers resp. the original version.

    my own personal subjective 5-star rating goes into the whole rating with 10-20 percent only. 80 percent of the rating process is in-depth assessment of musical motif, arrangement and structure, variety and dynamics, development and depth/breadth of the theme, expression and feel, uniqueness and/or innovativity, and performance. last but not least, i rate overall quality and lasting impression. this is not done by one autition only. up to 5 malus or bonus points may be subtracted or added according to two lists of 10 criteria each (including sound quality, metrics, virtuosity, instrumentation, interplay, expression of heart, genius work, simplicity/pureness, overdo, etc.). don’t ask for the specific point ratings for a track, i won’t reveal them, only the end result.

    please note carefully : the ratings reflect a critical *listen at the music* and not just my personal opinion or taste. neither reputation nor being a fan nor the latest hip genre affect the rating in any manner. i don’t care. on the other hand, if a mainstream artist outside my listening habits performs well, he/she will get my points, no matter what. possible high ratings do not necessarily go with my love for the particular piece of music or the artist. i even could nearly object giving points and might be surprised or angried by my own rating results for artists i normally don’t care much about. my loved tracks would yield a different list, and i admit, i even do love mediocre music, we all do. but it simply won’t get my high ratings. i hope this clarifies the difference between love and assessment, it’s two different worlds.

    once again : SiR HendRix Excellence Rating is not about “music i like”. it’s about a deeper understanding, appreciation, acknowledgement (and objection) of music performances beyond personal tastes. otherwise we wouldn’t need the Rating System.

    the scoring of music is a professional task with applying a numerical system to it on a consistent basis. the advantage is rapid precise communication of quality to experts and amateurs alike, nothing more, nothing less.

    music rated over 85 points is very good to excellent. please mind that the majority of quality music usually doesn’t cost more to listen to than to mediocre music. we don’t need to settle for less.


    *****

    98-100 points
    unbelievable (AAA)

    the top of the crop. music in this range is jaw-dropping, heart-stopping, really more than we could reasonably expect ...

    95-97 points
    extraordinary, profound (AA)

    the very best, a rare level of greatness and elegance. music in this range has very high caliber, is overwhelming and might blow you away (or knock your socks off) ...

    90-94 points
    outstanding, high quality (A)

    this is where special effort begins. music in this range is exceptional and terrific, but only few will make it into this category ...


    ****

    85-89 points
    flawless, very very good (BB)

    great value for the price. music in this range is very satisfactory and hardly objectionable ...

    80-84 points
    slightly above average (B)

    better than the bulk. music in this range has some redeeming features and is worth to be collected ...


    ***

    75-79 points
    very average, straightforward, mediocre and unremarkable (CC)

    music in this range is generally pleasant but lacks complexity, character, or depth. this is where most of the mainstream music resides. just switch on the radio or TV. if you want to become somewhat famous and rich as an artist, go here.

    70-74 points
    slightly below average (C)

    music in this range is imbalanced and should be less expensive to pay for ...


    **

    60-69 points
    definitely below average (D)

    music in this range is flawed, amateurish and to be avoided at all costs ...


    *

    50-59 points
    poor, unacceptable, terribly dull (E)

    words are insufficient to describe the inadequacy of this music ...



    ***** The List of Excellence *****

    this list is ever evolving and so are the rating points.

    you can bet that the musical diamonds listed here are NOT the ones most listened to ...


    ***** AAA : unbelievable *****

    100 points

    100 - Miles Davis - TocarConcierto de Aranjuez (adagio) - this genius piece of music is unbelievable. if Miles only had played this and Solea (next track, both from the album Sketches of Spain, 1960), he would still be known as one of the most creative musicians of the 20th century. most people today believe that this is jazz (40 years ago, they didn’t). Miles Davis was a genius capable of playing *music*, not only jazz. Gil Evans’ crossover orchestral arrangement of the famous second movement (adagio) of Joaquín Rodrigo’s concerto plays around the original folkloristic/neoclassical theme and recreates a spanish orchestral landscape, slowly moving from valencia to andalusia, and it’s Miles’ hauting horn that plays the part of the spanish guitar, and yes, of course he’s jazzing every now and then ... asked if this music is jazz, Miles responded “it’s music, and i like it.” some people call it , in oversimplified words : a new emergent genre somewhere between classic and jazz.


    99 points

    99 - Miles Davis - TocarSolea - Soleá is south spanish (andalusian) folk music, a form of (“palo”) flamenco, and Miles plays this genre crossover even more thrilling than the Concierto, weeping with his horn. we shouldn’t forget that without Gil Evans’ unique composition and emotive, expressive orchestration, this milestone of western art music wouldn’t exist. Solea is neither cool jazz nor jazz fusion, and it’s something different than flamenco jazz, again.


    ***** AA : extraordinary *****

    97 points

    97 - Thelonious Monk - TocarRound Midnight - the epitomy of bebop. does it need a comment ?


    96 points

    96 - Eddy Louiss - So What - on the live album Conférence De Presse, Eddy jams with Michel Petrucciani heartful duos of the piano and the hammond organ, nothing else, a rare combination. while Miles and his genius co-players did work hard in developing modal jazz, decades later these two fullblood jazzers can build on it and put much more fun and easyness in this uptempo cover version with much variety, in a relaxed and vibrant live setting with audience applauding after solo improvisations. better than Miles’ original studio version ? so what ...
    96 - Joe Jackson - Round About Midnight - very sensible orchestral cover of Monk’s signature tune on the 1984 sampler That's the Way I Feel Now: A Tribute to Thelonious Monk. arranged by multi-talent Joe Jackson who plays the piano part also.
    96 - Michel Petrucciani Trio - Say it Again and Again
    96 - Yo-Yo Ma - Sur: Regreso al Amor - world-level cellist Yo-Yo Ma interprets Astor Piazzolla’s melancholic soundtrack from the film Sur.


    95 points

    95 - Abdullah Ibrahim - The Pilgrim
    95 - Andreas Scholl - Messe en Si mineur - Agnus Dei - heart-touching aria from Bach’s famous “h-moll-Messe” (Mass in B minor BWV 232). german counter-tenor Andreas Scholl with Philippe Herreweghe conducting choir and orchestra of the Collegium Vocale, on last.fm tagged as Chorus And Orchestra Of Collegium Vocale, Ghent; Philippe Herreweghe. please note, this high rating goes not completely for the streamed version on last.fm—Johann Sebastian Bach - TocarAgnus Dei—which is a good ersatz at least. in offering excellent western art music performances (popularly labelled “classical”), last.fm is minor and it’s tedious to find the right versions (some people would say: “it sucks”). Herreweghe/Scholl’s version wins because of the more sensible interpretation, the more appropriate tempo and the purer voice.
    95 - Dollar Brand - TocarThe Pilgrim - this is the original album
    95 - Miles Davis - TocarWill o' the Wisp - by Manuel de Falla
    95 - Thomas Wilbrandt - Number Three (Gymnopédie) - by Erik Satie - Gymnopédie No. 3 - in a marvellous and very sensitive orchestral arrangement, so beautiful that it hurts - this is exceptional, because most orchestral versions don’t win over the original piano version (same as a movie compared to the novel)
    95 - Véronique Gens, Roger Vignoles - Au Bord De L'Eau Op. 8 No. 1 (Sully Prudhomme) - by Gabriel Fauré


    ***** A : outstanding *****

    94 points

    94 - Abdullah Ibrahim - Ntsikana's Bell
    94 - Abdullah Ibrahim - Saud
    94 - Carla Bley - TocarMisterioso - creative cover and orchestral arrangement of Monk’s famous tune on the 1984 sampler That's the Way I Feel Now: A Tribute to Thelonious Monk
    94 - Ella Fitzgerald - Summertime (Album Version) - with Louis Armstrong
    94 - Dollar Brand - TocarNtsikana's Bell - this is the original album
    94 - Gerardo Núñez - Tarifa (Bulería)
    94 - John Lennon - A Day in the Life - in fact, The Beatles, from their groundbreaking album Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band
    94 - Louis Armstrong - Summertime - feat. Ella Fitzgerald
    94 - Peter Thomas Sound Orchestra - TocarSpace Patrol (Raumpatrouille)
    94 - Susan Lincoln - O Virtus Sapientie
    94 - Thelonious Monk - TocarRuby My Dear
    94 - Thomas Wilbrandt - Alone, For A Second - by Erik Satie - Gnossienne No. 3 - again, this orchestral arrangement wins over the original piano version


    93 points

    93 - Alan Marks - Gnossienne No 3 - by Erik Satie (original piano version)
    93 - Gotan Project meets Chet Baker - TocarRound about Midnight - Gotan Project Meets Chet Baker - the masterpiece of this tango project, merging cool jazz with argentinian pub ambience
    93 - John Williams - Sayuri's Theme
    93 - Miles Davis - TocarFlamenco Sketches - the most musical and innovative ballad on the album Kind of Blue with five modal changes and free-form bar improvisation of each musician
    93 - Miles Davis - Flamenco Sketches (Alternate take) - hard to say which version is better, somehow it’s a foretaste to Sketches in Spain ...


    92 points

    92 - Antonio Vivaldi - Concierto RV 121 en Re mayor - Adagio
    92 - Cannonball Adderley - TocarAutumn Leaves (same track as Miles Davis) - this version is hot, hardbop merges with cool jazz. Cannonball Adderley, Miles Davis, Art Blakey and others. i particularly like the powerful screamy beginning, i always shiver ... it's like the movie is starting as a thriller but soon calming down to melancholy ... this recording made the love song ‘autum leaves’ to a jazz standard. the style is neither blues (but has a similar simple chord structure) nor "smooth jazz" (which wasn't yet developed at this time period and sounds completeley different). this version is modern bebop/hardbop with a swing.
    92 - Cannonball Adderley - TocarMercy, Mercy, Mercy - erroneously held as jazz blues, but this hardbop style is soul jazz, similar to Horace Silver's 'song for my father' or Herbie Hancocks 'cantaloupe island'. this song was seminal for the style and for live recordings of jazz music.
    92 - Klazz Brothers & Cuba Percussion - Air (Bach, Air BWV 991 en DO Mineur)
    92 - Miles Davis - TocarAll Blues - from the album Kind of Blue, more “busy” than Blue in Green (see below). the last.fm track is a different live version, though.
    92 - Miles Davis - TocarAutumn Leaves
    92 - Miles Davis - TocarSo What - the epitomy and pinnacle of from the best-selling album Kind of Blue, played by a leading group of jazz musicians in 1959, Miles Davis, Cannonball Adderley, John Coltrane, Bill Evans and Paul Chambers. this is the original ‘downtempo’ version, later versions are played faster. we can safely say : you don’t know what jazz is if you ignored this most influential highlight of 20th century music.
    92 - Prince - Under the Cherry Moon - he’s a multi-talent


    91 points

    91 - Cecilia Bartoli - TocarVivaldi: Sposa son desprezzata - the great art singers are massively underrepresented on last.fm. this belcanto aria is fascinating, and despite the fact that the music is from the *baroque era*, it’s NOT “baroque music”. understand the difference ? Vivaldi fostered a new style of composition called which abandoned traditional baroque styling and opened the way to viennese classics. interestingly, Vivaldi is wrongly attributed as the composer, in fact he took it from Francesco Gasparini and included it into his pasticcio opera Bajazet. “reuse” was a common practice in early music (as it is now again). not ending the musical confusion, Cecilia is performing the aria in a *19th century piano adaptation* done by Alessandro Parisotti, a romantic era composer. baroque - classic - romantic, 3 centuries, 3 grand eras, all united in this little piece of music. Cecilia’s relatively low timbre with only sparse trills adds to the expressiveness of this, let’s say it again, *non-baroque* aria. the correct italian wording is ‘Sposa son disprezzata’—I’m a wife and I am scorned. and so are you, poor listeners.
    91 - Enigma - TocarCallas Went Away
    91 - Miles Davis - TocarBlue In Green - the most sensitive track on the album Kind of Blue with different modal changes. a fine interplay between Miles and pianist Bill Evans, soothing and smoothing ...
    91 - Miles Davis - TocarFreddie Freeloader - again from the 1959 landmark album in : Kind of Blue, an unusual twelve-bar blues composed by Miles, and three giants of jazz meet to play it out on their horns, Miles Davis, John Coltrane and Cannonball Adderley
    91 - Refractory - Yo Solo Quiero (feat. Youn Sun Nah) - the Korean newcomer in jazz astonishes with her singing performance in portuguese and spanish as well
    91 - Yo-Yo Ma - J.S. Bach: Cello Suite #1 In G, BWV 1007 - 1. Prélude


    90 points

    90 - Aretha Franklin - TocarRespect
    90 - De-Phazz - Nonsensical Thing
    90 - Herbie Hancock - TocarCantaloupe Island - the very prominent example of the 60s emerging style of soul jazz
    90 - Herbie Hancock feat. Tina Turner - TocarEdith And The Kingpin
    90 - Horace Silver - TocarSong For My Father - Horace Silver's signature instrumental, a kind of hardbop bossa nova (inspired by a trip to brazil) in the soul jazz style that emerged in the 60s. Henderson's sax solo adds some mellow (post-)bop feeling. Stevie Wonder "stole" the horn riff for his song 'Don't you worry 'bout a thing'.
    90 - Jean Boguet - La Fille Aux Cheveux De Lin - by Claude Debussy
    90 - Michel Petrucciani - Tocar100 Hearts - piano solo
    90 - Omar Sosa - TocarMis tres Notas - this cuban pianist is amazing, more to expect ...


    the purpose of the _ Center of Excellence _ is to collect and document the most outstanding and extraordinary music performances on this planet.

    of course, only few make it into the _ Center of Excellence _. for quality music below excellence rating [80-89 = ****] refer to the List of Quality, documented in the House of Quality.

    i never ever will rate music upon request. so please don’t ask.
    if you told me this sytem reminds you of Robert Parker’s wine rating system, i would respond : exactly.


    SiR HendRix
    //
  • emo ?

    Ago 11 2008, 23h53

    i wasn’t impressed.

    but no ! i WAS impressed.

    a shoutbox for tags, and this one had, after a couple of days, way more than -- drum roll -- 1.000 entries !

    what shoutbox, what tag am i talking about ?

    emo.

    seems to be the abbreviation for “emotional” ...

    that’s exactly what happened at this funny place.
    and that’s what did impress me less.

    why ?

    well, if different people group different kinds of music of a meager one or two decades losely together and call it 'emo', some disagree, some are annoyed and others even get angry.

    why ?

    because, they are "right" and others are "wrong".

    wrong.

    look, what should I say ?

    i listen to very very VERY different kinds of music starting from, say, the 9th century, spanning more than 1.000 years until a hundred years ago, ten years ago, ten days ago ... and going into a lot of serious, unserious, crazy, jazzy, funky, and melodic and rhythmic and loud and hard and soft and sexy and non-sexy polyphonic and monophonic variations of EVERY DAMNED EMOTION ON EARTH -- and all people on last.fm call this whole complex and versatile musical university of mine : CLASSICAL !!!

    know what my most-used tag is ?

    NON-CLASSICAL.

    fellow listeners, stop spoiling me with your silly tags !

    and stop boring yourself with your narrow-minded 'emo' discussion.

    it's not about the music.

    you're using music as a tool for distinguishing yourself against each other. other tools that go with this in-/out-group behavior are clothings, slang, colors, facial expressions, and -- last.fm tags.

    hot, kiddos.

    someone said it : “emo is used as an insult, just to say that it's gay ... the genre which many people say it's the "true emo" is called "emocore". I think that the tag "emo" was created by the haters and not by the people who like that kind of music.”

    haha.

    right or wrong. who cares ?

    emo-taggers, lover and haters : let's get back to the music. you certainly know what jazz is. it’s the most influential musical genre of the 20th century. now, the tag 'jazz' is used around 400.000 times on last.fm. now look at this disproportionality : the tag 'emo' is used 200.000 times. ha ? get the picture. YOU ALL made 'emo' IMPORTANT. before i joined last.fm, i didn't even know that i was ignoring a such important music-induced emotion over the very important last emotional 20 years. thanks for opening my eyes. keep on arguing.

    i keep on listening.
  • chiLLout

    Ago 11 2008, 18h42

    i must admit, i used this tag 11 times, and i must confess, i already regret. it's a virus ! the same goes for 'ambient'. the rule of thumb seems to be, if it's not "dance", it's "chillout". and even if it's dance music, we have a strict chillosophy : it's chiLLout, because we want to relax. we use to dance all day and night, work hard, exercise and work out, we need to listen to a lot of "chillout" music ...

    you already got it, it's not about the music, it's about human perception, behavior, and culture, it's about the USABILITY of music : contemporary popular music and perception of music has reached it's highest stage so far : it's all about - chillin' out.

    this is our gift for the 21st century. we are coming to reinterpret all music and check out it's CHILLABILITY. let's use our virus and spill it over to bach, vivaldi, scarlatti, johann strauss, erik satie, maurice ravel, ravi shankar, vangelis, otis redding, miles davis, jimi hendrix, stevie ray vaughan, amy winehouse, frank sinatra, klaus schulze, stan getz, enigma, quadro nuevo, bugge wesseltoft, kronos quartet, antônio carlos jobim, viktor lazlo, björk, the beatles and - the filmscore of memoirs of a geisha (to name a few) ...

    they all have what's it all about in music : the CHILL.

    i'm out.
  • about tags for tracks

    Ago 6 2008, 14h02

    isn't this funny ? after listening and tagging on last.fm for five weeks or so, i came to realize that reading the tags for a track will mostly give me some clue of what music NOT to expect ... and i have to resist to see them all, because it will confuse me even more, it only shows that people don't agree in what genre or style or even era this piece of music is. and mostly it's pigeonholes like predefined answers in a school test. i guess our musical education sucks.
  • understanding music without prejudice

    Jul 23 2008, 14h07

    listening to queens 'who wants to live forever' and typing my tags,
    i was once again confused by the automatic suggestions given.

    this is only one example, but it happens all the time, within each
    and every genre and style. i respect all personal tags but the
    genre assignments are confusing.

    i would love to have been stopped all this lazy, flat, and misleading tags. listening to this marvellous orchestral song without prejudice, would we call it a 'classic rock' piece ? BTW, in 1986, the 'classic rock era' was over. and rock elements are only the smaller contributions to this song. what are your suggestions ? i tagged it 'power ballad', 'progressive', 'symphonic'. if john adams would have been written this piece, people would tag it 'contemporary classical', if enya would cover it, people would believe it's 'new age' ... artists origins (and marketing lingo) shape our beliefs about what we are hearing -- forever ?

    the same goes with ambient, chillout, trip hop, classical, world, acid jazz, nu-jazz, soul, etc. etc.

    salut to all true listeners. just had to shout it out :-)