Copyleft Notice (1:38)

Você tem alguma informação a respeito desta faixa?
Ajude a construir a Last.fm, adicionando as informações à página wiki referente a esta faixa.

Faixas parecidas

Faixa	Duração	Ouvintes
Out Of Tune - Damaged Cybernetics	5:13	325
Out Of Tune - 56 Seconds	1:53	448
Manifesto Jukebox - Safety Valve	3:35	502
Manifesto Jukebox - No Love Lost	3:00	903
Appendix - Ai	1:08	176
Riistetyt - Lopun Alku	2:34	61

777ouvintes no total

2.230scrobbles acumulados

Tendência de ouvintes recentes:

Deixe um comentário. Faça login na Last.fm ou registre-se.

DouglasAWh

@ambybunny my understanding was any license with -SA was Copyleft and that this was simply not free culture. Also, not all countries have a legal doctrine called "public domain" so that may be a source of confusion

4 Jul 2011 Responder
flinzz78

?

25 Out 2009 Responder
Vanilla-villa

I lol'd, the hell is with this song?

4 Abr 2009 Responder
ks_nicsta

I hate people who dont do there research.... aka ambybunny. Can you only speak when you have something informitive to say... Informitive and correct.

24 Dez 2008 Responder
Ambybunny

The irony here is neither the album or the song are licensed with a copyleft license, the lyrics claiming the song is "copyleft" and "public domain" make no sense. There are six CC-licenses, from which the non-commercial (nc) and no derivatives (nd) are not free licenses, not copyleft. The whole album is released with a CC by-nc-sa license which prohibits any commercial use. Restricting the commercial use is by far not the same as giving the all the same rights the originator has to the receiver of the work, which is what copyleft does. That means, copyleft licenses (like CC by-sa and GPL) do not restrict commercial uses. Using a CC-license doesn't automatically make something copyleft. ``CC-by-nc-sa, which requires non-commercial use only is share-alike but is not free content, and thus cannot be considered a Copyleft license."

2 Dez 2008 Responder