Silly Pitchfork article

- zvodkaz disse...
- Usuário
- Jun 1 2010, 7h30
Silly Pitchfork article

http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/7702-the-decade-in-noise/1/

Anyone read this article?

Pretty funny really, you can tell the person who wrote isn't really involved with noise at all.

[quote][b][user]zvodkaz[/user][/b] disse: http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/7702-the-decade-in-noise/1/ Anyone read this article? Pretty funny really, you can tell the person who wrote isn't really involved with noise at all.[quote]

Permalink Citar
- [Usuário excluído] disse...
- Usuário
- Jun 2 2010, 4h17
Ha, I think this was mentioned in another thread. Reminds me of high school papers I wrote at the last minute. Seeing this article again makes me not too enthusiastic about seeing Wolf Eyes and Black Dice next week. BEST NOISE SHOW OF THE DECADE.

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] disse: Ha, I think this was mentioned in another thread. Reminds me of high school papers I wrote at the last minute. Seeing this article again makes me not too enthusiastic about seeing Wolf Eyes and Black Dice next week. BEST NOISE SHOW OF THE DECADE.[quote]

Permalink Citar
- tinnitustimulus disse...
- Usuário
- Jun 2 2010, 5h37
i think i would hate animal collective a ot less if people didn't consider them noise.

i havn't seen any youngins into noise as much, so i might actually think noise was really broke that decade however

#$%$#%#$%@&^*!!

[quote][b][user]tinnitustimulus[/user][/b] disse: i think i would hate animal collective a ot less if people didn't consider them noise. i havn't seen any youngins into noise as much, so i might actually think noise was really broke that decade however[quote]

Permalink Citar
- zvodkaz disse...
- Usuário
- Jun 2 2010, 5h40
The hipster interest in noise seems to be blowing over a bit at the moment.

[quote][b][user]zvodkaz[/user][/b] disse: The hipster interest in noise seems to be blowing over a bit at the moment.[quote]

Permalink Citar
- Keborap disse...
- Usuário
- Jun 12 2010, 3h33
i think hipster interest in noise is really just to be ironic and different, instead of an actual enjoyment.

[quote][b][user]Keborap[/user][/b] disse: i think hipster interest in noise is really just to be ironic and different, instead of an actual enjoyment.[quote]

Permalink Citar
- chinesechurch disse...
- Usuário
- Jun 13 2010, 12h47
[spam]

[spam]

[quote][b][user]chinesechurch[/user][/b] disse: [spam][quote]
Editado por hjbardenhagen em Jan 8 2011, 9h31

Permalink Citar
- [Usuário excluído] disse...
- Usuário
- Jun 13 2010, 18h10
That is a deep Seinfeld

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] disse: That is a deep Seinfeld[quote]

Permalink Citar
- POTDL disse...
- Usuário
- Jul 10 2010, 13h30
what problem?

i don't read the article complete but i see something...
i mean then hipsters like noise poor noisicians get more money for they stuff...so what's the fucking matter? you say something like being open but you're not open if you say hipsters can't hear noise or there are not really interested. or using terms like hipster noise for artists like Aaron Dilloway.
and yeah animal collective (and the author doesn't call it noise, he call it noisy) is not noise but i read names like merzbow, whitehouse, keiji hiano, harry pussy etc. and dear fucking god, the did noise/harder noise rock or not? and pitchfork guys normally knows much about music also about stuff like drone...maybe that writer was not the best choice but he is not a guy which describe only merzbow as noise or?
and also the readership of pitchfork can't fucking do anything with names of bands/projects which are really unknown.
so be happy that noisician got from the trend some money.
what i found a lot more shittier are the women hating death metal guys (not everyone but much) which are these stuff not heavy and brutal enough and make the cheesy pedal noise (how long are my pedal chain=how long is my guitar) shows with gasmasks and covers with bloody raped chicks (and mean that serious)...that's boring (yeah i'm so cocky i hear harsch noise), happy noise is NEW (i like flowers and horses but also feepy sounds, hihi)!!!

cheers and sorry for harsch words

[quote][b][user]POTDL[/user][/b] disse: i don't read the article complete but i see something... i mean then hipsters like noise poor noisicians get more money for they stuff...so what's the fucking matter? you say something like being open but you're not open if you say hipsters can't hear noise or there are not really interested. or using terms like [tag]hipster noise[/tag] for artists like [artist]aaron dilloway[/artist]. and yeah animal collective (and the author doesn't call it noise, he call it noisy) is not noise but i read names like merzbow, whitehouse, keiji hiano, harry pussy etc. and dear fucking god, the did noise/harder noise rock or not? and pitchfork guys normally knows much about music also about stuff like drone...maybe that writer was not the best choice but he is not a guy which describe only merzbow as noise or? and also the readership of pitchfork can't fucking do anything with names of bands/projects which are really unknown. so be happy that noisician got from the trend some money. what i found a lot more shittier are the women hating death metal guys (not everyone but much) which are these stuff not heavy and brutal enough and make the cheesy pedal noise (how long are my pedal chain=how long is my guitar) shows with gasmasks and covers with bloody raped chicks (and mean that serious)...that's boring (yeah i'm so cocky i hear harsch noise), happy noise is NEW (i like flowers and horses but also feepy sounds, hihi)!!! cheers and sorry for harsch words[quote]

Permalink Citar
- selfsurprise disse...
- Assinante
- Fev 24 2011, 22h33
Is there really all that much difference between the " I wear ironic media glasses" types and us "I MAKE MUSIC WITH AN EMPTY TIN OF QUALITY STREET" types? If there is i've seemed to of missed it. If this sort of musical segregation carries on much longer we'll all have to form black metal bands! :p

"The art of the present is too close to be judged or made sense of now; too unkown to be forced into language; too bright to do anything other than dazzle those who try to look at it. If we want to understand it, we must wait until it stops changing and living, until it eases into a position of comprehensibility and is written into history". ~ Lisa Le Feuvre

[quote][b][user]selfsurprise[/user][/b] disse: Is there really all that much difference between the " I wear ironic media glasses" types and us "I MAKE MUSIC WITH AN EMPTY TIN OF QUALITY STREET" types? If there is i've seemed to of missed it. If this sort of musical segregation carries on much longer we'll all have to form black metal bands! :p[quote]

Permalink Citar
- brya1290 disse...
- Usuário
- Mai 8 2011, 20h26
re. "Silly Pitchfork Article"

Take your fucking pick, really. Did anyone ever read their review of Kid A? Seriously, swallow your pride and do it.

LAST NIGHT A DJ RAPED MY WIFE

[quote][b][user]brya1290[/user][/b] disse: Take your fucking pick, really. Did anyone ever read their review of Kid A? Seriously, swallow your pride and do it.[quote]

Permalink Citar
- [Usuário excluído] disse...
- Usuário
- Dez 25 2011, 13h37
Pitchfork's whole indie/hipster persona is a sham. They are to independent music what Ebert is to movies: mainstream thinking on a broad subject for mainstream people.

They're "media observers" who are willing to namedrop Brainbombs or humor the latest Merzbow with a lukewarm review, but are much more interested in fellating the last Justin Bie--...sorry, Kanye West album, because they know that shit will endear with idiots thanks to marketing and they want to seem historically "right".

Their writing is worthless because they see music as a product rather than as art. I don't give a fuck about the lead singer's haircut, or the status quo of some contrived, unnaturally invented gen-Y fake genre like chillwave or witchhouse. I care about music, and they don't seem to share that sentiment.

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] disse: Pitchfork's whole indie/hipster persona is a sham. They are to independent music what Ebert is to movies: mainstream thinking on a broad subject for mainstream people. They're "media observers" who are willing to namedrop Brainbombs or humor the latest Merzbow with a lukewarm review, but are much more interested in fellating the last Justin Bie--...sorry, Kanye West album, because they know that shit will endear with idiots thanks to marketing and they want to seem historically "right". Their writing is worthless because they see music as a product rather than as art. I don't give a fuck about the lead singer's haircut, or the status quo of some contrived, unnaturally invented gen-Y fake genre like chillwave or witchhouse. I care about music, and they don't seem to share that sentiment.[quote]

Permalink Citar

Usuários anônimos não podem postar mensagens. É preciso fazer login ou criar uma conta para postar nos fóruns.

Silly Pitchfork article

Silly Pitchfork article

[spam]

what problem?

re. "Silly Pitchfork Article"