Ubuntu Linux » Discussões

AmaroK or Rhythmbox?

 
  • @skrimstla: No, it's not, but it does require KDE packages to run.

  • Guayadeque!! ^_^

    It's not how you live your life but it's how you savor every moment of it...
  • prefer using clementine than the others :D

  • Exclusively use MPD, occasionally mplayer2 (for music with messy tags)

  • Rhythmbox

    • ashandvc disse...
    • Usuário
    • Jan 3 2012, 12h35
    amarok, love kde

    • Lie13 disse...
    • Usuário
    • Jan 5 2012, 14h20
    I used to think Rhytmbox is the best playes. Then I gone for Banshee. And now I use Clementine. It's a good one.

  • Clementine !!
    ONLY Clementine : 3

    • ptck_ disse...
    • Usuário
    • Fev 18 2012, 18h04
    Clementine is my fav.

    Screw clementine and other native players, foobar works with wine, lovely!

    Foobar2000 for the win!

    Editado por ptck_ em Mar 7 2012, 17h41
  • Amarok

  • VLC.

    Rhythmbox, Banshee and Audacious felt buggy, slow and partly unresponsive on my old notebook, all three of them crashed regularly. VLC is the only that appears to be relatively reliable without using too much CPU and memory.

  • ^Ever tried QuodLibet?

  • Rhythmbox > Amarok.

    If I would go for a GUI based player...imo nothing beats "Banshee" in terms of features.

    But personally I use this: http://irenicus09.wordpress.com/2012/03/06/commandline-based-music-player/

  • @flame_leaf thanks, never heard of QuodLibet, but I'm gonna try it soon :)

Usuários anônimos não podem postar mensagens. É preciso fazer login ou criar uma conta para postar nos fóruns.